Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  6 / 75 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 75 Next Page
Page Background

5

SBE, Vol.20, No.1, 2017

ISSN 1818-1228

TOWARDS AMETA THEORY OFACCOUNTING

FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: REVIEW

THE REALITIES TO STAGE THE CRITICAL

THINKING OF KNOWLEDGE BUSINESS

MODEL

Ahmed Ali Mohammad

Department of Accounting and Information Systems, College of Business and Economics

Qatar University, Doha

amohammad@qu.edu.qa

Abstract

: Knowledge management has always seen as an engine to convert

tacit knowledge into explicit. Knowledge assets are facilitators to make

such conversion. Knowledge management paradigm is a turning point in the

management theories of business. When such paradigm has business dominance,

it is time to question how to account for it ? Accounting for “how” and “why”

has been largely neglected by the professional bodies and scholars of accounting.

Accounting for knowledge management paradigm can be very critical in terms

of questioning some of the fundamental assumptions of financial statements.

The focus has been very narrow and anachronistic. Accounting for knowledge

management is a problematic issue warrant further investigations. Its involves

far more than the need to address the paradoxes and lacks of accounting model

and practices. The extension of institutional accounting theories highlights how

accounting against knowledge management is totally different from accounting

for operations? Yet, the failure is shaped by the areas of asset recognition and

the appropriateness of the going concern assumption. The virtue of conflict is

grounded in nature of key assets, materiality, agility, visibility, periodicity,

creativity, connectivity, interactivity, continuity, and survival. This paper argues

that accounting for knowledge management must be based on understanding the

dynamic nature of knowledge management. This paper contributes to accounting

literature by being the first to identify how knowledge management reality has

shaken the theoretical logic of accounting.

Key words:

Accounting, knowledge management, intangibles, intellectual,

knowledge assets, and value paradox.

I. INTRODUCTION

Knowledge is an engine of business success

and a unique survive asset, and accounting is

the only business reporting system. Knowledge

is the fuel of business value which supports

market capitalization. The knowledge driven

literature have placed much attention on

consequences of emergence of knowledge

management. A new business management

has shaken the assumptions and concepts of

accounting. Accounting capital is no longer

a driver of competitive advantages, rather

knowledge capitals in terms of intellectual,

technology, and customer capitals. The